HONG KONG BABYLON

New Yorker, August 7, 1995

ONWARD AND UPWARD WITH THE ARTS  The cult of Hong Kong movies is grow­ing. Why are they so out­ra­geous and vio­lent? It may have some­thing to do with the indus­try that pro­duces them.
_______________________

BY FREDRIC DANNEN

JACKIE CHAN, the most pop­u­lar film actor in the world, stepped out onto the ledge of a clock tow­er. More than fifty feet below, in a town square, a group of onlook­ers wait­ed anx­ious­ly to see him jump. They had been wait­ing for days. The onlook­ers were the cast and crew of “Project A,” a com­e­dy-action film about pirates on the Chi­na Sea in turn-of-the-cen­tu­ry Hong Kong. In real­i­ty, the time was 1982, and Jack­ie Chan was the new king of the Hong Kong cin­e­ma, the colony’s biggest draw since Bruce Lee died, a decade ear­li­er. Chan, like Lee, had once been a kung-fu artist, but now he was some­thing different—a com­e­dy-action star who did his own stunts. The scene in the town square called for Chan, who has been cor­nered by pirates, to dan­gle Harold Lloyd-style from the clock’s minute hand, then plum­met through two cloth awnings and hit the ground—all in one take, to make it clear that Chan was not using a safe­ty mat. The crew had pretest­ed the stunt, in a man­ner of speak­ing, by toss­ing a sack of top­soil off the ledge, but the test was not ter­ri­bly sci­en­tif­ic, and Chan could not be cer­tain that the fall wouldn’t kill him. “I just don’t want to go down,” Chan recalls think­ing. “Scared.” So the entire pro­duc­tion of “Project A” came to a halt for more than a week while he stood on the ledge every day, steel­ing him­self. Final­ly, he announced that he was ready, let go of the clock­face, and, as planned, tore through the first awning. But instead of tear­ing through the sec­ond awning, he inad­ver­tent­ly bounced off it, was flipped upside down, and hit the ground head first. By some mir­a­cle of Hong Kong luck, he was not seri­ous­ly injured. A few days lat­er, he tried the stunt again. This time, it went per­fect­ly.
     When I met Chan one morn­ing, at his office build­ing, on the Kowloon side of Hong Kong, he had recent­ly bro­ken his ankle jump­ing from a bridge onto a hov­er­craft for his new movie, “Rum­ble in the Bronx.” I got there ear­ly and wait­ed for him down­stairs, expect­ing him to arrive with an entourage. Instead, he walked in unac­com­pa­nied and, as if I might not rec­og­nize him, said, in a qui­et voice, “I am Jack­ie.” He was dressed in black pants, a match­ing vest, and a white shirt, and car­ried a cel­lu­lar phone. Chan is about five feet nine, lean and mus­cu­lar, with a Bea­t­les hair­cut, and a hand­some face off­set by a pug nose. The nose, which he has bro­ken three times, gives him an under­dog look, which is cen­tral to his screen per­sona. He escort­ed me upstairs, mov­ing slow­ly and stiffly. Chan is now forty-one, and more than twen­ty years of stunt work have wrought per­ma­nent skele­tal dam­age. His most seri­ous acci­dent occurred in Yugoslavia in 1986, dur­ing the film­ing of “Armour of God,” an Indi­ana Jones-style adven­ture: he had no trou­ble exe­cut­ing the film’s most dan­ger­ous stunt, in which he jumps off a moun­tain and lands on top of a drift­ing hot-air bal­loon, but while he was per­form­ing a rel­a­tive­ly easy leap onto a tree he turned to make sure the cam­era would catch his face, missed a branch, fell forty feet, and hit his head on a rock. He required brain surgery, and still has a hole in his skull.
     Chan hoped that “Rum­ble in the Bronx,” which he filmed pri­mar­i­ly in Van­cou­ver, would appeal to an Amer­i­can audi­ence, for he has had a long, per­plex­ing romance with the Unit­ed States. Though between 1980 and 1985 he appeared in four Amer­i­can films, includ­ing “The Can­non­ball Run” and its sequel, and starred in two—“The Big Brawl,” oppo­site Jose Fer­rer, and “The Pro­tec­tor,” oppo­site Dan­ny Aiello—he has yet to achieve fame here. But he is the biggest movie star in Asia, a far larg­er audi­ence. A per­son­al appear­ance by Chan in Taipei or Seoul or Tokyo can cause a riot. “In Asia,” he says, “I am ‘Juras­sic Park.’ I am ‘E.T.’”
     Hong Kong is often called Dong­fang Hao­lai­wu, the Hol­ly­wood of the East. It pro­duces more than two hun­dred fea­tures a year, and is the world’s sec­ond-largest exporter of films, after the Unit­ed States. Besides enter­tain­ing Hong Kong’s own movie-mad pop­u­lace, the colony’s films fill the movie the­atres in Tai­wan, Sin­ga­pore, Malaysia, Thai­land, the Philip­pines, and Indone­sia, and are immense­ly pop­u­lar in South Korea and Japan. In main­land Chi­na, Hong Kong movies are pirat­ed like crazy. Though for Amer­i­can audi­ences the movies remain cult films, the cult is grow­ing rapid­ly. The Hong Kong fes­ti­val held each sum­mer at Cin­e­ma Vil­lage, in New York, is always a sell­out, as was a recent Jack­ie Chan marathon there.
     It must be said that the pro­duc­tion val­ues of Hong Kong films are not always the best. Bud­gets are minus­cule by Hol­ly­wood stan­dards: a mil­lion Unit­ed States dol­lars is aver­age, and four mil­lion is very big. Film com­pa­nies are able to churn out fea­tures from start to fin­ish in sev­en or eight weeks. Movies are edit­ed as they are being shot, and post-pro­duc­tion time is aston­ish­ing­ly brief. (I was told of one major film for which the shoot­ing end­ed four days before the sneak pre­view.) Most Hong Kong movies are filmed with­out syn­chro­nized sound; the entire sound­track is cre­at­ed after­ward in a record­ing stu­dio. Often, top stars, includ­ing Jack­ie Chan, don’t even both­er to dub in their own voic­es, but instead use voice dou­bles.
     The major­i­ty of Hong Kong films have sub­ti­tles in Chi­nese and English—the for­mer because writ­ten Chi­nese is the same for all the dif­fer­ent spo­ken dialects, and the lat­ter sim­ply by tra­di­tion. Sim­i­lar­ly, the movies have dual Chi­nese and Eng­lish titles, and most top stars have Chi­nese and Eng­lish names; Ani­ta Mui, for exam­ple, is actu­al­ly Mui Yim-fong. These con­ven­tions great­ly assist the Amer­i­can fan, although the Eng­lish sub­ti­tles can be dis­con­cert­ing. (“After see­ing Kitty…I had pri­apism!”)
     The movies’ low bud­gets help explain why so much empha­sis is placed on stunt work. The defin­i­tive moment in “Stone Age War­riors” (1991), a medi­um-bud­get shock­er filmed in New Guinea among abo­rig­i­nal head­hunters, comes as the movie’s two hero­ines plunge over a hun­dred-foot water­fall; and the way the direc­tor, Stan­ley Tong, filmed the scene is a per­fect illus­tra­tion of the dif­fer­ence between Hol­ly­wood and Hong Kong. When Har­ri­son Ford appears to dive over the rag­ing waters of a dam in “The Fugi­tive,” it is an illu­sion cre­at­ed by means of a com­put­er mat­ting tech­nique known as blue screen. Hong Kong direc­tors can­not afford the blue screen, so Tong and his stunt assis­tant dressed up as the two hero­ines, tied them­selves to some trees with wire, and went over the falls.
     The Hong Kong com­mu­ni­ty of male and female actors in lead­ing roles is rather small; it does not take long for the same twen­ty or thir­ty faces to become famil­iar. When Hong Kong movie stars are on a hot streak, they can work at a pace that Amer­i­can film actors would find incom­pre­hen­si­ble. For exam­ple, over the past decade, Andy Lau, who, like many top actors, is also a Can­tonese-pop record­ing star, has appeared in more than sev­en­ty films. At his peak, in 1991, he aver­aged a movie a month, and dur­ing one stretch he was act­ing in four dif­fer­ent movies a day, at as many loca­tions, and sleep­ing in his car.
     The over­ex­po­sure of cer­tain top names has to do with the unique eco­nom­ics of the film indus­try in Hong Kong. The the­atre chains of Asia are so eager for new Hong Kong pic­tures that a movie com­pa­ny can pre-sell an as yet unpro­duced film, for a con­sid­er­able sum, all around the Asian cir­cuit. The only thing that mat­ters is the cast. Indeed, many Hong Kong films are shot with­out a script. Anyone—literally, anyone—who can per­suade a pop­u­lar per­former or two to appear in his movie can make the movie with lit­tle or no invest­ment of his own. As a result, some of the most active movie pro­duc­ers in the colony dur­ing the past decade have been the triads—Hong Kong Chi­nese orga­nized-crime figures—whose pow­ers of per­sua­sion com­pen­sate for their igno­rance of film tech­nique.
     Per­haps the best way to describe the Hong Kong genre is to speak of its com­ic-book aes­thet­ic: it is a cin­e­ma of inces­sant action, eye-pop­ping effects, and car­toon­like vio­lence. I think, for instance, of the tree-dev­il ser­pent in “A Chi­nese Ghost Sto­ry,” who saps the life of its vic­tims with a mile-long tongue, and whose human form is an aging drag queen; the cli­mac­tic shootout in “Full Con­tact,” which is filmed from the bul­lets’ point of view; the mar­tial-arts star Jet Li in “Once Upon a Time in Chi­na,” fight­ing on a lad­der sus­pend­ed high above the ground like a see­saw; the psy­chot­i­cal­ly evil male and female Siamese twins in “The Bride with White Hair,” who kill with a look; and Jack­ie Chan in “Police Sto­ry,” hang­ing from a speed­ing bus by an umbrel­la.
     While cer­tain stars—Chan, to name one—strive for whole­some­ness, the lev­el of sex and gore in the Hong Kong cin­e­ma is peer­less. Pop­u­lar, main­stream films shock the view­er in ways that no Hol­ly­wood stu­dio would ever attempt. The gang­ster film “The Big Heat” (1988) opens with a shot of a pow­er drill pierc­ing a man’s hand. In “The Hero­ic Trio” (1993) three of the top actress­es in Hong Kong—Michelle Yeoh, Ani­ta Mui, and Mag­gie Cheung—are cos­tumed super­heroines doing bat­tle with a sub­ter­ranean vil­lain who is kid­nap­ping babies he plans to train as his nether­world army; in one scene, two of the hero­ines encounter a group of five-year-old boys who already show signs of train­ing, so they blow them up. In “Run and Kill” (1993) a man incin­er­ates his enemy’s twelve-year-old daugh­ter into char­coal, sets her corpse at the enemy’s feet, and mim­ics the girl’s voice, say­ing, “Dad­dy, I am so dark, can you still rec­og­nize me?”
     Hong Kong films are most­ly in Can­tonese, the local dialect, which is con­sid­ered rather less refined than the Man­darin dialect of main­land Chi­na and Tai­wan, and is appar­ent­ly bet­ter suit­ed to com­mer­cial rather than art films. Hong Kong’s most inter­na­tion­al­ly famous direc­tor is John Woo, a com­mer­cial film­mak­er whose 1989 New Wave gang­ster movie “The Killer” is prob­a­bly the best-known Can­tonese-lan­guage film in the West. Woo, who has since been lured to Hol­ly­wood, has had a lot to do with the grow­ing audi­ence for Hong Kong movies here. (Until recent­ly, most of the Chi­nese-lan­guage movies that have received nation­al dis­tri­b­u­tion in the Unit­ed States have been art-house fea­tures in Man­darin from main­land Chi­na or Taiwan—films such as Zhang Yimou’s “Raise the Red Lantern” and Chen Kaige’s “Farewell My Con­cu­bine.”)
     Per­haps anoth­er rea­son for the enhanced inter­est in Hong Kong films is the pop­u­lar­i­ty of Quentin Taran­ti­no, a fan of the genre, whose first fea­ture, “Reser­voir Dogs,” appro­pri­ates plot ele­ments from a Hong Kong movie, Ringo Lam’s “City on Fire.” Mira­max has giv­en Taran­ti­no his own dis­tri­b­u­tion com­pa­ny, Rolling Thun­der, through which he plans to release “Chungk­ing Express,” a sto­ry of two lovelorn cops, direct­ed by Wong Kar-wai, a mem­ber of Hong Kong’s small coterie of art-film direc­tors. Mira­max also plans to issue two Jack­ie Chan movies next year—”Drunken Mas­ter II,” the superb 1994 sequel to a Chan film from the late sev­en­ties; and “Crime Sto­ry,” a 1993 action film that, for a change, empha­sizes Chan’s dra­mat­ic act­ing over his stunt work.
     The eight­ies and ear­ly nineties were a glo­ri­ous era for the indus­try, both cre­ative­ly and finan­cial­ly. Inno­va­tors such as Wong Kar-wai and Tsui Hark, a mas­ter of the com­ic-strip style of Hong Kong film­mak­ing, flour­ished. After such a sus­tained boom, a down cycle was prob­a­bly inevitable, and one set in about two years ago. Although movies fea­tur­ing the biggest stars, such as Jack­ie Chan, the dra­mat­ic lead­ing man Chow Yun-fat, and the come­di­an Stephen Chow, still draw huge crowds, over-all the­atre atten­dance has declined thir­ty per cent since 1992. What is dif­fer­ent and, to some peo­ple, dis­turb­ing about the cur­rent down cycle is that it comes at a time when the entire colony is ner­vous about its future, because of the cer­e­mo­ny that is to take place at mid­night, June 30, 1997—the moment when a cen­tu­ry and a half of British colo­nial rule will come to an end, and Hong Kong will revert to Chi­na. The atmos­phere of “Take the mon­ey and run” has cer­tain­ly not helped the film indus­try; a num­ber of top peo­ple have left the busi­ness or, like John Woo, left Hong Kong. Those who remain feel some anx­i­ety. Hong Kong direc­tors who have filmed in Chi­na com­plain that they have encoun­tered cen­sor­ship, bureau­cra­cy, and cor­rup­tion. No one knows what to expect.

THE FIRST HONG KONG MOVIE, “To Steal a Roast­ed Duck,” was made in 1909 with financ­ing from an Amer­i­can and with a direc­tor and cast from Shang­hai. Until the ear­ly nine­teen-fifties, both Shang­hai and Hong Kong were major movie towns, but the nation­al­iza­tion of Shanghai’s pri­vate stu­dios by the Com­mu­nists left Hong Kong’s movie indus­try pre­em­i­nent. After the war, Asia’s most pow­er­ful movie mogul was Run Run Shaw, one of four broth­ers from Shang­hai who began pro­duc­ing and exhibit­ing films in the nine­teen-twen­ties. In 1958, Run Run moved the Shaw Broth­ers oper­a­tion to Hong Kong, and three years lat­er he over­saw the com­ple­tion of Movie Town, the largest stu­dio com­plex ever built in Asia, on a forty-six-acre lot in Hong Kong’s Clear­wa­ter Bay. He was sub­se­quent­ly knight­ed by Queen Eliz­a­beth.
     The year Shaw Broth­ers relo­cat­ed to Hong Kong, Run Run hired Ray­mond Chow, a for­mer jour­nal­ist and the son of the chair­man of the Bank of Chi­na, as his head of adver­tis­ing and pub­lic­i­ty. Before long, Chow had moved up to head of pro­duc­tion, a posi­tion he held for eleven years. “We were very close, but our rela­tion­ship was strict­ly busi­ness,” Chow says of Sir Run Run. “I was nev­er real­ly a part­ner of Shaw Broth­ers. Had I been one, I would prob­a­bly nev­er have set up my own cor­po­ra­tion.” The com­pa­ny that Chow founded—in 1970, along with Leonard Ho, who had been his right hand at Shaw Brothers—was Gold­en Har­vest. It has gone on to become the biggest movie con­glom­er­ate in Hong Kong, while by 1986 Sir Run Run had all but with­drawn from movies to con­cen­trate on tele­vi­sion.
     Chow, who is now in his late six­ties, is a shy, slight, bald­ing man with glass­es, but as a boy he stud­ied kung fu, and his appre­ci­a­tion of the mar­tial arts proved for­tu­nate. In 1970, he signed Bruce Lee—a dual Hong Kong and Amer­i­can cit­i­zen who had three years ear­li­er played the role of Kato in the Amer­i­can tele­vi­sion pro­gram “The Green Hor­net.” Lee’s first chop-socky, “The Big Boss,” broke all pre­vi­ous box-office records in Asia when it was released, in 1971, and net­ted Gold­en Har­vest a return of five hun­dred times its invest­ment. After mak­ing two more hits the fol­low­ing year, Lee starred in an Eng­lish-lan­guage film, “Enter the Drag­on,” which was co-pro­duced with Warn­er Bros. In July, 1973, when Lee was part­way through film­ing a fifth fea­ture, “Game of Death,” he died sud­den­ly, at age thir­ty-two, of an ede­ma in the brain caused by a reac­tion to an unpre­scribed painkiller.
     Gold­en Har­vest rebound­ed, first with come­dies and then, begin­ning in the late sev­en­ties, with Jack­ie Chan, whose pop­u­lar­i­ty in Asia has sur­passed even Bruce Lee’s. Chan, who directs many of his own films, is a per­fec­tion­ist, and his pro­duc­tions are the antithe­sis of Hong Kong’s rapid, assem­bly-line approach to film­mak­ing. “With a Jack­ie Chan movie, there is no sched­ule and no bud­get,” says his long­time man­ag­er, Willie Chan (no rela­tion).
     Chan often speaks of Buster Keaton, who also per­formed stunts of con­sid­er­able brava­do, as his idol and inspi­ra­tion. (In one of Chan’s best films, “Project A II,” the 1987 sequel to “Project A,” the façade of a build­ing col­laps­es on him, but he pass­es safe­ly through a window—a sight gag bor­rowed from Keaton’s “Steam­boat Bill, Jr.”) While Keaton grew up in vaude­ville, Chan grew up in a kind of trav­el­ling cir­cus. He was born Chen Gang-shen, in Hong Kong, on April 7, 1954, and was an only child. His father, a cook, and his moth­er, a maid, were so poor, he says, that they offered to sell him for twen­ty-six dol­lars to the British doc­tor who deliv­ered him. The doc­tor declined the offer, but when Chan was sev­en his par­ents moved to Can­ber­ra, Aus­tralia, aban­don­ing him to a board­ing school in Hong Kong called the Chi­na Dra­ma Acad­e­my. There Yu Chan-yuan, a feared taskmas­ter, trained a hun­dred or so boys and girls in the art of Peking Opera—an enter­tain­ment in which acro­bat­ics, mime, mar­tial arts, and sword­play are as impor­tant as singing. The school was free, but Mas­ter Yu was enti­tled to what­ev­er his stu­dents earned from their per­for­mances. Too young to under­stand his enroll­ment con­tract, Chan select­ed the longest pos­si­ble term of inden­tured servitude—ten years.
     The con­tract also per­mit­ted Mas­ter Yu to beat and starve his stu­dents at will, and he did so rou­tine­ly. (The main­land-Chi­nese movie “Farewell My Con­cu­bine,” which real­is­ti­cal­ly depicts a Peking Opera acad­e­my, con­tains scenes of child tor­ture that are dif­fi­cult to watch.) Chan and his fel­low-stu­dents were awak­ened every morn­ing at a quar­ter past five and put through their paces until mid­night. They learned to sing by scream­ing in front of a brick wall, and to per­form som­er­saults and back­flips like Olympians. They learned to apply face paint. They learned to punch and kick, and to han­dle more than a dozen weapons, includ­ing the spear and the broadsword. Only about an hour a day was spent on for­mal edu­ca­tion, and Chan still can­not read or write flu­ent­ly in Chi­nese.
     When Chan grad­u­at­ed, in 1971, the Peking Opera was dying in Hong Kong, and he dis­cov­ered that his train­ing best suit­ed him to be a movie stunt­man. He was even­tu­al­ly groomed to be the “new” Bruce Lee, and between 1976 and 1978 he made sev­en kung-fu quickies—all flops. Then he had an epiphany. “The audi­ence like Bruce Lee and doesn’t like me,” he recalls think­ing. “So how can I get rid of the Bruce Lee shad­ow and be Jack­ie Chan? Then I look at Bruce Lee all the film. O.K. When Bruce Lee kick high, I kick low. When Bruce Lee punch, he is the super­hero; when I punch, ahh!”—he shakes his hand. “It hurts.” By com­bin­ing kung fu and com­e­dy, Chan was reborn a star. In “Drunk­en Mas­ter,” the 1978 movie that made him famous through­out Asia, Chan is a dis­re­spect­ful young man who is taught how to fight by an old wino of an uncle.
     Chan joined Gold­en Har­vest in 1979, and the fol­low­ing year, with Chow’s sup­port, he began a two-year res­i­den­cy in Los Ange­les and enrolled in a lan­guage school in Bev­er­ly Hills to work on his Eng­lish. After return­ing to Hong Kong, hav­ing failed to crack the Amer­i­can mar­ket, Chan decid­ed that he would no longer make his­tor­i­cal kung-fu films. He moved his sto­ries into urban set­tings, and his new style of pic­ture, begin­ning with “Project A,” prob­a­bly has no bet­ter ana­logue than the action-filled come­dies of the Amer­i­can silent-movie era. He also began a tra­di­tion of show­ing out­takes of flubbed stunts dur­ing the clos­ing cred­its of his movies; at the end of “Project A,” for exam­ple, one can see him land­ing on his head after bounc­ing off the sec­ond awning of the clock tow­er. No one leaves a Jack­ie Chan movie dur­ing the clos­ing cred­its.
     With each new movie, Chan tried to out­do the out­landish stunts of the pre­vi­ous one. Before long, he was unable to get insur­ance. It was also becom­ing dif­fi­cult for Gold­en Har­vest to recruit stunt­men who were will­ing to act with him—”Everybody knows Jack­ie Chan is crazy,” he says—and soon he found it nec­es­sary to assem­ble his own stunt team, and pay their fre­quent hos­pi­tal bills. (Dur­ing the film­ing of “Police Sto­ry,” a 1985 movie about a mav­er­ick Hong Kong cop, two stunt­men crashed through the upper deck of a dou­ble-deck­er bus and hit the pave­ment, instead of land­ing on the car roof that was sup­posed to have cush­ioned their fall.) As usu­al, though, Chan leaves the most hair-rais­ing moments for him­self; in the last reel of “Police Sto­ry” he jumps off a rail­ing in the atri­um of a depart­ment store, slides down a sev­en­ty-foot string of explod­ing Christ­mas lights, and crash­es through a glass ceil­ing. Because of a mis­un­der­stand­ing, the prop­man used house cur­rent instead of a low-volt­age car bat­tery to light the bulbs, and Chan could have been elec­tro­cut­ed. Luck­i­ly, he suf­fered no per­ma­nent injuries, although, he says, “all the skin peel off my hands.”
     Over the years, the women in Chan’s movies have tend­ed to be orna­men­tal. “Jack­ie believes that women should not fight,” the direc­tor Stan­ley Tong says. Tong him­self believes oth­er­wise, so in 1992, when Gold­en Har­vest asked Tong to direct Chan in “Police Sto­ry III,” bet­ter known as “Super Cop,” he cast the top action actress in Hong Kong, Michelle Yeoh, as Chan’s side­kick. Like Chan, Yeoh, who is now thir­ty-two, does her own stunts and fight scenes, and she is every bit as gut­sy as he is. She comes from the small min­ing town of Ipoh, in West Malaysia, and she grew up speak­ing Eng­lish and Malay before learn­ing Chi­nese. She moved to Eng­land as a teen-ager, stud­ied dance and dra­ma, and act­ed in plays by Shake­speare and Oscar Wilde. Upon return­ing home, she won the Miss Malaysia beau­ty pageant. Then, in 1987, for a lark, she signed a con­tract to star in some action films for a new pro­duc­tion com­pa­ny called D&B, one of whose co-founders, Dick­son Poon, had made a for­tune in wrist­watch­es. Yeoh learned freestyle box­ing, and dis­cov­ered that she could punch and kick with tremen­dous speed. By the time she made her sec­ond fea­ture, “Roy­al War­riors,” she was expect­ed to do almost noth­ing but kick male butt. “My lines were like ‘Oh, well, we have to fight again,’“ she told me. In 1988, at the age of twen­ty-six, after com­plet­ing her fourth movie, she was at the top of her pro­fes­sion, but at that point Dick­son Poon mar­ried her and encour­aged her to retire. Three years lat­er, they were divorced, and Poon with­drew from film pro­duc­tion.
     “Super Cop” was Yeoh’s come­back pic­ture, and she made the most of it by per­form­ing a num­ber of dan­ger­ous stunts, such as rolling off the top of a van and onto the hood of a fast-mov­ing sports car. In the movie’s cli­max, Yeoh hops on a motor­bike, chas­es after a speed­ing train car­ry­ing the bad guys, rides off a steep hill, lands on the train, and ditch­es the bike on impact. (Yeoh learned how to ride a motor­bike the day before she exe­cut­ed the stunt.) “When I see the movie now, I sit there and think I must have been mad,” she says. Jack­ie Chan, who had sat glum­ly by the side of the train dur­ing the film­ing of the motor­bike stunt, after vain­ly try­ing to talk Yeoh out of doing it, could not allow him­self to be best­ed. In the same scene, he leaps off a build­ing, grabs the rope lad­der of an air­borne heli­copter, dan­gles a thou­sand feet over the city of Kuala Lumpur, crash­es through a bill­board, and jumps onto the train.

IN HONG KONG, movie stars are refresh­ing­ly busi­nesslike and unpam­pered, and movie pub­li­cists don’t even exist. But because gang­sters exert so much con­trol, those who work in the indus­try face prob­lems that are far more complicated—and poten­tial­ly lethal—than any faced by their Amer­i­can coun­ter­parts. Per­haps the clos­est the film indus­try comes to a tem­pera­men­tal actress is Ani­ta Mui, with whom Jack­ie Chan has been linked roman­ti­cal­ly. Mui, who is full-lipped and sul­try, is some­times called the Madon­na of Hong Kong, because besides being an actress she is a plat­inum-sell­ing Can­tonese-pop singer who likes to get down and dirty in her con­certs and videos.
     In the ear­ly morn­ing hours of May 4, 1992, Mui found her­self in seri­ous trou­ble. She and some friends were giv­ing a birth­day par­ty for her assis­tant in a pri­vate room at Take One, a karaoke club in Kowloon, where many movie indus­try peo­ple have their offices. It was prime time for Mui—a night owl, she is noto­ri­ous­ly dif­fi­cult to roust for a day­time shoot—but she should prob­a­bly have known bet­ter than to show up at a karaoke bar, since they are pop­u­lar hang­outs for tri­ads. (The word “tri­ad” is used to denote both a mem­ber of a Chi­nese crim­i­nal soci­ety and the soci­ety itself.) As it hap­pened, a man named Wong Long-wai, who was both a tri­ad and a movie producer—not an unusu­al com­bi­na­tion in Hong Kong—was in anoth­er part of the club that morn­ing, with his wife and at least one busi­ness asso­ciate. Wong Long-wai was no one to tri­fle with. The tri­ad to which he belonged, the 14K, was a pow­er­ful one, and he was the head of a par­tic­u­lar­ly vio­lent fac­tion.
     Some­time that morn­ing, Wong learned that Mui was at the club, and he evi­dent­ly asked her to have a drink with him and sing a song. A social encounter between a film star and a tri­ad is like­ly to have bad con­se­quences. The next day, the tri­ad calls the star’s man­ag­er with the news that the star has promised to appear in the triad’s new film. Actors have reput­ed­ly been kid­napped and actress­es raped for refus­ing to work for tri­ads. Mui declined Wong’s invi­ta­tion, but, accord­ing to tes­ti­mo­ny from one of Wong’s employ­ees, she declined rudely—and in Eng­lish. “Don’t speak to me in Eng­lish. I don’t under­stand,” Wong said, to which Mui respond­ed, in Eng­lish, “So what?” Wong slapped her.
     The inci­dent should have end­ed there, but oth­er Hong Kong tri­ads besides the 14K had an inter­est in the movie busi­ness, and per­haps not all of them were inclined to over­look an assault on a movie star. The fol­low­ing evening, Wong Long-wai was leav­ing a restau­rant in the Wan Chai dis­trict of Hong Kong when he was con­front­ed by three men, one of whom claimed to be Ande­ly Chan, also known as the Tiger of Wan Chai. The Tiger was a race-car dri­ver in his ear­ly thir­ties who had many friends in the movie industry—including, it was said, Ani­ta Mui. He was also a tri­ad. Accord­ing to tes­ti­mo­ny in a sub­se­quent tri­al, one of the Tiger’s men slashed Wong Long-wai’s arm with a knife, and the Tiger struck Wong in the face with a mobile phone. Wong was hos­pi­tal­ized for the knife wound. Two days lat­er, some­one slipped into Wong’s hos­pi­tal ward and shot him fatal­ly in the head. Ani­ta Mui imme­di­ate­ly fled Hong Kong.
     Many peo­ple were quick to crit­i­cize Mui, includ­ing Jack­ie Chan, her old boyfriend; he said he had repeat­ed­ly warned her to stay away from night clubs. Chan is vir­tu­al­ly the only movie star in Hong Kong who is immune to tri­ad pressure—partly because he has the back­ing of a major, legit­i­mate com­pa­ny, Gold­en Har­vest, and part­ly because his movies are expen­sive and take a long time to make, where­as most tri­ads want a fast buck. Willie Chan, Jackie’s man­ag­er, has had griev­ous prob­lems with tri­ads, how­ev­er. Man­agers in the Hong Kong movie indus­try per­form a role akin to that of Hol­ly­wood agents, except that they rarely have mul­ti­ple clients; there are no Mike Ovitzes in Hong Kong. Willie Chan was once the sole excep­tion. In 1986, the top actress Mag­gie Cheung—who plays Jackie’s long-suf­fer­ing girl­friend in the “Police Sto­ry” series—asked Willie to rep­re­sent her, and when he agreed many oth­er actors fol­lowed suit. “At my peak, I man­aged about forty-four artists,” Willie told me. “But then the pres­sure from the tri­ads became too great. They just said, ‘I don’t care what you do—I want this girl or this guy.’ So a few years ago I decid­ed to give up most of my artists. Maybe Jack­ie alone is good enough.” He refused to say more, and his agi­ta­tion had become vis­i­ble. Tony Deakin, a Detec­tive Chief Inspec­tor of the Roy­al Hong Kong Police, says, “We were informed that a gun was point­ed at Willie’s head for release of the actor Andy Lau. Willie denies the inci­dent, but I think the pos­si­bil­i­ty of its being true is quite gen­uine.”
     For­tu­nate­ly for Willie, he had nev­er man­aged Ani­ta Mui. In the months that fol­lowed Wong’s mur­der, Mui lay low, in the Unit­ed States, Europe, and Japan. A gris­ly rumor cir­cu­lat­ed that the 14K want­ed her leg in ret­ri­bu­tion, though there was no evi­dence that she had con­spired in Wong’s knif­ing or shoot­ing, nor was she ever charged in con­nec­tion with either offense. The Tiger, mean­while, had been arrest­ed in Macao as a sus­pect in the mur­der, and then released for lack of evi­dence, but he was sched­uled to stand tri­al for the knif­ing.
     On Novem­ber 20, 1993, the Tiger fin­ished sec­ond in the Macao Grand Prix, and was almost imme­di­ate­ly dis­qual­i­fied when his race car was found to have ille­gal mod­i­fi­ca­tions. As he stepped out of a hotel in Macao around three o’clock the fol­low­ing morn­ing, he was shot dead by three men wear­ing motor­cy­cle hel­mets. After that, the mat­ter seemed to be set­tled. No con­vic­tions result­ed from either the Tiger’s mur­der or Wong’s, or from the knife attack on Wong. Ani­ta Mui, who had returned to Hong Kong, kept qui­et about the entire affair, except for com­plain­ing in a Sin­ga­pore news­pa­per, “Which man would want to mar­ry a woman who has so much trouble?”

WHILE GOLDEN HARVEST, the movie con­glom­er­ate that pro­duces Jack­ie Chan’s films, remains the indus­try leader, in recent years a com­pa­ny called Win’s Group has come on strong. Win’s has access to a large num­ber of top stars, and it has pro­duced so many hit movies that Gold­en Har­vest, once a direct com­peti­tor, has agreed to dis­trib­ute many of them through an affil­i­ate. Win’s is con­trolled by two broth­ers named Heung Wah-keung and Heung Wah-sing, who are also known as Charles and Jim­my Heung. Next to Ray­mond Chow of Gold­en Har­vest, the Heung broth­ers are prob­a­bly the most pow­er­ful peo­ple in the Hong Kong movie busi­ness today.
     Charles and Jim­my Heung are, respec­tive­ly, the tenth and thir­teenth chil­dren of the late Heung Chin, who, in 1919, found­ed the Sun Yee On, by far the largest tri­ad in Hong Kong. In 1988, the eldest broth­er of Charles and Jim­my, a law clerk named Heung Wah-yim, was con­vict­ed in Hong Kong of being the Drag­on Head, or boss, of the Sun Yee On, but the con­vic­tion was reversed on appeal in Great Britain. Charles and Jim­my have repeat­ed­ly denied being tri­ads, and, as far as I was able to dis­cern, nei­ther of them has a crim­i­nal record. Ear­li­er this year, the Unit­ed States Attorney’s Office in Brook­lyn won a rack­e­teer­ing case against a Chi­na­town busi­ness­man with alleged ties to the Sun Yee On. One of the key wit­ness­es claimed to have been in the Sun Yee On, and iden­ti­fied five of the Heung broth­ers, includ­ing Charles and Jim­my, as “top guys.”
     The Hong Kong police seem to view the Heung broth­ers as omnipo­tent. “No one in Hong Kong will talk to us about the Heungs unless he is will­ing to emi­grate to Nige­ria after­wards,” Tony Deakin says. One after­noon, I vis­it­ed Charles Heung in his office, in Tsim Sha Tsui, at the south­ern end of Kowloon. It is point­less to ask some­one in Hong Kong if he belongs to a tri­ad, because mem­ber­ship alone is a crime. I raised the sub­ject indel­i­cate­ly enough for Heung to catch on, how­ev­er. He spoke at length in Can­tonese to one of his employ­ees, and she then told me, “Since you are curi­ous to know the back­ground of Mr. Heung, his fam­i­ly, to be hon­est, they do have a Mafia back­ground, because his father was one of the heads. But the father died when Mr. Heung was very small, and he had very lit­tle knowl­edge of what was going on. Over the years, Mr. Heung has had to work even hard­er to over­come the neg­a­tive effects of the fam­i­ly name.”
     Heung, who is a hand­some man in his mid-for­ties, with close-cropped hair and a face that sug­gests vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty, has act­ed in a few of his company’s films. In “Return of God of Gam­blers” (the movie that will open the Hong Kong Film Fes­ti­val at Cin­e­ma Vil­lage on August 11th) he plays a sen­si­tive body­guard. The movie’s direc­tor, Wong Jing, a squir­rel­ly man with large glass­es, makes most of his films for the Heungs, and is one of the most suc­cess­ful direc­tors and pro­duc­ers in Hong Kong. He is some­times called the Can­tonese Roger Cor­man, because, even in a cin­e­ma known for its exploita­tion films, he stands out. (“Naked Killer,” a movie he wrote and pro­duced, fea­tures a team of emas­cu­lat­ing les­bian assas­sins in hot pants.) One day last Novem­ber, at about three in the after­noon, as Wong was about to enter his office in Kowloon three men jumped him from behind and bashed his teeth in. Wong has a rep­u­ta­tion for being talk­a­tive, but when the police ques­tioned him about the assault—after his den­tal surgery—he was mum. “We firm­ly believe he got beat­en up for some­thing he said, because his attack­ers con­cen­trat­ed on his mouth,” Tony Deakin told me. “Maybe he was talk­ing about cer­tain peo­ple behind their backs.” I asked Charles Heung for his reac­tion to the assault. “We will leave it to the police to solve,” he said. Then he laughed.
     The assault on Wong Jing did not appear to upset the movie industry—he is not ter­ri­bly well liked by his peers. The Heungs, on the oth­er hand, are sur­pris­ing­ly pop­u­lar. Movie peo­ple make a dis­tinc­tion between “bad” tri­ads and “good” tri­ads, and when they com­plain about the involve­ment of gang­sters in the film indus­try, they are usu­al­ly refer­ring to the ones who rape and kid­nap and use oth­er coer­cive means to get actors and actress­es to sign con­tracts. The Heungs are nev­er accused of any­thing like that. Both broth­ers are con­sid­ered to be knowl­edge­able and cre­ative film­mak­ers; Win’s Group, their com­pa­ny, makes a lot of good movies and pays com­pet­i­tive salaries. More­over, if you work for the Heungs there is a con­sid­er­able bonus: the bad tri­ads tend to leave you alone. These days, Charles Heung told me, smil­ing, “the most famous stars in Hong Kong have con­tract with us.”
     The mar­tial-arts star Jet Li, for exam­ple, began mak­ing movies for Win’s in 1993. The pre­vi­ous year, he lost his man­ag­er, Jim Choi, to two gun-wield­ing assas­sins dressed as secu­ri­ty guards: Choi was shot down as he stepped out of an ele­va­tor in the build­ing where he worked, short­ly after he had argued on the phone with a bad tri­ad who want­ed to use Jet Li in a movie. Andy Lau, who is both the biggest pop singer in South­east Asia and a pop­u­lar roman­tic lead­ing man, is also in busi­ness with the Heungs. Before he struck up this arrange­ment, he had ter­ri­ble prob­lems with bad tri­ads. In Novem­ber, 1993, his assis­tant, a twen­ty-six-year-old woman, wound up in the hos­pi­tal after her apart­ment was fire-bombed. “There is lots of movie that is made by the gang­ster, and it was hard for me to reject that kind of project, so I just take it with a smil­ing face,” he said.
     In the past few years, one man has emerged in the eyes of the movie indus­try as par­tic­u­lar­ly bad. His name is Chan Chi-ming. The South Chi­na Morn­ing Post has sug­gest­ed that Chan is con­nect­ed to a main­land Chi­nese broth­er­hood called the Big Cir­cle, though he has nev­er been con­vict­ed as such. “We believe he’s been behind a lot of vio­lence in get­ting actors for films,” Tony Deakin says, adding, “We have absolute­ly no proof.” Recent­ly, Chan Chi-ming sent a script to the film star Chow Yun-fat, and when Chow didn’t respond some­one threw a cat’s head into his court­yard. Chan is a for­mer pro­fes­sion­al box­er in his ear­ly thir­ties, mar­ried, with three chil­dren. He is super­sti­tious, and is said to have gone into the movie busi­ness on the advice of a for­tune-teller. A por­trait of Chair­man Mao hangs in his office. He pro­duced his first movie, “Hong Kong God­fa­ther,” in 1991. It starred Andy Lau.
     Chan Chi-ming want­ed Leslie Che­ung, the star of “Farewell My Con­cu­bine,” to appear in his next project, but Cheung’s movie com­pa­ny, Man­darin Films, refused to lend him out. The actor was busy com­plet­ing Mandarin’s release for the 1992 Lunar New Year, a com­e­dy enti­tled “All’s Well, Ends Well.” The first week of the Lunar New Year is the time of peak movie atten­dance in the Chi­nese-speak­ing world, equiv­a­lent to our sum­mer and Christ­mas sea­sons com­bined. On Jan­u­ary 9, 1992, a month before the sched­uled release of “All’s Well, Ends Well,” five masked men armed with pis­tols and knives burst into Mandarin’s film lab­o­ra­to­ry in Kowloon and demand­ed the neg­a­tives. One of the thieves was tried and con­vict­ed; in a confession—later recanted—he said he had com­mit­ted the rob­bery for Chan Chi-ming, but Chan was nev­er charged. “All’s Well, Ends Well” opened as planned. “They stole the wrong neg­a­tives,” Leslie Che­ung told me.
     The Man­darin Films rob­bery was more than the movie indus­try could tol­er­ate. Five days lat­er, dur­ing the morn­ing rush hour, more than three hun­dred actors, direc­tors, cam­era­men, screen­writ­ers, and pro­duc­tion-crew mem­bers marched on Police Head­quar­ters in the busi­ness dis­trict of Hong Kong. Jack­ie Chan was at the head of the parade, wear­ing a yel­low arm­band. Among those march­ing beside him were Andy Lau, the com­e­dy star Stephen Chow, and the busty soft-porn star Amy Yip, whose movies include “Robot­rix” and “Sex and Zen.” The pro­test­ers car­ried a large ban­ner that read “Show Busi­ness Against Vio­lence,” and hand­ed the police a peti­tion urg­ing that the movie com­mu­ni­ty be pro­tect­ed from extor­tion. The march came to be known as a demon­stra­tion against tri­ads, though in fact it was a demon­stra­tion against bad tri­ads.
     The fol­low­ing year, Chan Chi-ming’s career in motion pic­tures was inter­rupt­ed when, dur­ing a busi­ness trip to Shen­zhen, a city in south Chi­na, he was jailed for unlaw­ful sex­u­al inter­course with a Chi­nese res­i­dent. (It is wide­ly believed that the Heungs lured Chan to Shen­zhen and used their influ­ence to arrange his arrest. When I asked Charles Heung if this was true, he laughed and said, “Of course not true. I am not so big pow­er!”) After a year of incar­cer­a­tion, Chan Chi-ming returned to Hong Kong and, to the amaze­ment of the movie indus­try, relo­cat­ed his com­pa­ny, Wang Fat Film Pro­duc­tion, direct­ly across the street from the office of Charles Heung. On a recent after­noon, he agreed to speak with me about his career. Chan has a dark com­plex­ion and large, sen­su­al lips, and he was dressed, improb­a­bly, in a her­ring­bone jack­et, a flo­ral tie, and tor­toise­shell glass­es. I quick­ly dis­cov­ered that Chan defies inter­view­ing. Most­ly, he gig­gled or made cryp­tic pro­nounce­ments, such as “The movie busi­ness is like a fly­ing drag­on.” I asked how he had man­aged to get a big star like Andy Lau to act in his first movie. “It was fate,” Chan said.

FOR ALL THE PROBLEMS the indus­try has had with tri­ads, its movies tend to make them seem hero­ic. Per­haps the blame lies with John Woo, the acknowl­edged mas­ter of the Hong Kong gang­ster film. Woo, who was born in Can­ton in extreme pover­ty in 1946 and now lives and works in Los Ange­les, has achieved the recog­ni­tion from the Amer­i­can movie indus­try that con­tin­ues to elude Jack­ie Chan. He is fas­ci­nat­ed with the themes of loy­al­ty and broth­er­hood, and the tri­ads in his movies are mod­ern, gun-tot­ing ver­sions of hon­or­able Chi­nese swords­men. Woo has them slaugh­ter one anoth­er with oper­at­ic grandeur. His first gun­play pic­ture, “A Bet­ter Tomor­row,” released in 1986, spawned scores of imi­ta­tions, and set off a fash­ion craze for the trench­coat and sun­glass­es worn in the film by the actor Chow Yun-fat. (This was no small accom­plish­ment, since Hong Kong is too humid for trench­coats.)
     I met Woo not long ago on the lot of Twen­ti­eth Cen­tu­ry Fox, where he is now at work on “Bro­ken Arrow,” a movie about a stolen nuclear mis­sile, star­ring Chris­t­ian Slater and John Tra­vol­ta. He was dressed in black, down to a pair of zip­pered boots. A short, mod­est man, he greets vis­i­tors with a bow. Woo has found work­ing in Hol­ly­wood a sober­ing expe­ri­ence. In Hong Kong, the direc­tor is king; when Woo made his movies there, he said, “even the boss from the stu­dio is not allowed to see any footage. Every day, I can shoot based on my instinct, and I can put the new stuff in any minute. I only need to deliv­er the final print.” With­in rea­son, this is the norm. Even direc­tors who work for triads—a fate that Woo avoided—never com­plain of cre­ative inter­fer­ence. As the direc­tor Wong Kar-wai puts it, “it’s bet­ter to deal with a god­fa­ther than an accoun­tant.”
     “Hard Tar­get,” Woo’s first Amer­i­can movie, star­ring Jean-Claude Van Damme, involved a lot of accoun­tants. “I just didn’t get used to the sys­tem here,” Woo said, shak­ing his head. “Too many meet­ing, too many politic. So many peo­ple get their input in the script. The peo­ple have so much wor­ry and fear, and some­times they are afraid to make any deci­sion. So you have to deal with them, and waste time and ener­gy on those kind of things.… In Hong Kong, I feel I work like a painter. In Hol­ly­wood, I also work like a painter, but some­how my hand is tied up by rope.” He sighed. “But I still think I can do some­thing here.”

AT THE END of “Super Cop,” Jack­ie Chan’s Hong Kong police offi­cer jokes to Michelle Yeoh’s Chi­nese inspec­tor that it doesn’t mat­ter which gov­ern­ment gets the bad guys’ loot, since 1997 is just around the cor­ner. That is about the most dar­ing polit­i­cal ref­er­ence I’ve seen in a Hong Kong film—an art form that scrupu­lous­ly avoids overt polit­i­cal con­tent. The Hong Kong cen­sor­ship board is far less inter­est­ed in sex and vio­lence than in ref­er­ences that might offend Chi­na. The direc­tor Ann Hui told me, “I have a sub­ject I real­ly want to do. It’s imper­a­tive we make a film about Hong Kong peo­ple in the peri­od of June 4th”—the day in 1989 when the Tianan­men Square mas­sacre took place. “I spent the last two years try­ing to get mon­ey to make this film, and I was treat­ed like some­one with lep­rosy.”
     Film­mak­ers have every rea­son to be wor­ried about the com­ing reuni­fi­ca­tion. Under the terms of the Sino-British Joint Dec­la­ra­tion, Hong Kong will be per­mit­ted to pre­serve its laws and its free-enter­prise sys­tem for fifty years after its acces­sion to China—provided, of course, that Chi­na keeps its word. “Who knows? The Chi­nese gov­ern­ment, their pol­i­cy can change every day,” the direc­tor Stan­ley Kwan says. Kwan’s most recent movie, “Red Rose White Rose,” was filmed in Shang­hai, and the expe­ri­ence left him shak­en. He dis­cov­ered that the main­land government’s pol­i­cy is to con­fis­cate all neg­a­tives and, after a review by cen­sors with an eye to polit­i­cal and sex­u­al con­tent, allow the direc­tor to take home no more than ten thou­sand feet of film—about two hours’ worth—for post­pro­duc­tion. “So that mean if you have a new idea after you get the final cen­sor cut, no way can you do it,” he said. One of the love scenes in Kwan’s movie did not meet China’s strin­gent anti-pornog­ra­phy stan­dards, and had to be smug­gled out. As a penal­ty for the smug­gling, Kwan will not be allowed to film on the main­land again for two years.
     Even after the reuni­fi­ca­tion, it may be finan­cial­ly risky for Hong Kong movies to appear pro-Chi­na in sen­ti­ment, because that might offend Tai­wan. It was only a decade ago that Tai­wan black­balled Hong Kong film­mak­ers or actors who so much as shot on loca­tion in Chi­na. (Tony Leung, the star of Jean-Jacques Annaud’s “The Lover,” was unable to get act­ing work for years for this rea­son.) Tai­wan remains the largest export mar­ket for Hong Kong movies, and tick­et sales there can cov­er as much as twen­ty per cent of a movie’s bud­get.
     The main­land has his­tor­i­cal­ly pro­vid­ed lit­tle or no income to the Hong Kong movie busi­ness, and what’s worse is that the Com­mu­nist gov­ern­ment has con­doned, and offi­cials have even prof­it­ed from, the pira­cy of Hong Kong films. There is no guar­an­tee that Chi­na will become a sig­nif­i­cant source of rev­enue for Hong Kong film­mak­ers after 1997, though the poten­tial rewards of tap­ping into a hith­er­to closed mar­ket of a bil­lion two hun­dred mil­lion peo­ple could be tremen­dous. “The Chi­na mar­ket is our future,” Charles Heung told me con­fi­dent­ly. In August, 1993, the Heung broth­ers entered into a joint-ven­ture agree­ment with a Chi­nese cor­po­ra­tion to build the­atres and video-rental out­lets across Chi­na and a film stu­dio in Shen­zhen. Two months after the deal was signed, Gold­en Har­vest fol­lowed suit by mak­ing a sim­i­lar agree­ment. The Heungs and Gold­en Har­vest now have dis­tri­b­u­tion rights in Chi­na for all non-pirat­ed Hong Kong videos and laser disks. “There will be a lot of teething prob­lems,” Ray­mond Chow said, sound­ing rather less con­fi­dent than Heung. “But it is a very impor­tant step in the right direc­tion.”
     One added ben­e­fit of Gold­en Harvest’s joint-ven­ture deal is that Jack­ie Chan’s recent films are now offi­cial­ly sanc­tioned in Chi­na. Mean­while, his pop­u­lar­i­ty in the rest of Asia is undi­min­ished. His lat­est movie, “Thun­der­bolt,” sched­uled to open in Hong Kong on August 8th, is far and away the most expen­sive Hong Kong movie ever made—it cost more than twen­ty mil­lion dol­lars. Chan plays an inter­na­tion­al­ly famous race-car dri­ver who befriends a group of teen-age Hong Kong hot-rod­ders and helps them over­come some nasty tri­ads; in the process, he crash­es a few cars and sets him­self on fire. When I asked Chan if he has made prepa­ra­tions for 1997, I was not sur­prised by his answer. “I nev­er think tomorrow—I think what I’m doing today,” he said. “Peo­ple ask me, ‘You don’t scare 1997?’ I say, ‘I don’t know I still alive in 1997.’” ♦